In a setting that is an alternate version of feudal Japan, with races of anthropomorphic animals instead of humans but no other (overt) magic and myth, what would it mean for a fox-person to be a kitsune?
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Base style: Corinthian by
- Theme: Sol y Luna by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-12-05 01:45 (UTC)I'll address the point you both brought up, and invoked, and trace it back to the root . . . what do kitsune represent in the first place, beyond the cultural concept? From what I've read, they're a trickster fox spirit. Or demon. Who have multiple tails, the rules for which are never really explicit.
So if you're going to approach "anthropomorphic foxes as kitsune" then you should stop and ask some questions for foundations:
- Are there foxes which are not "kitsune"? If so, what's the difference?
- If "kitsune" are indeed mystical in nature, are they actually magical or SPIRITUAL in nature? (There is a significant difference in nature depending on approach there.)
- What would their relationship to the material world actually be? Even if they weren't spirits, magical, mundane, or none of the above, how do they relate to the world at large?
From there you can use your answers to build up with more questions. Sure, it's all "author fiat" but then you have a roadmap of questions to work with.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-05 02:05 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-05 02:56 (UTC)That and the Socratic method of answering questions irritates the living crap out of me :P
no subject
Date: 2008-12-05 03:02 (UTC)I'm just curious. I didn't find anything to disagree with in what you said about kitsunes, so maybe you can explain what I did that offended you so much.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-05 05:03 (UTC)